Suchergebnisse

The article next to the hermeneutic methodology examines the key aspects of a special model of political regime: the "ethnic democracy" of S. Smooha, which is based on the idea of the development of an ethnic nation in a state. According to this author's point of view, the main idea of this form of stability is the absolute control of the ethnic majority over the minority. It examines the reasons for the emergence of "ethnic democracy", the characteristics of its implementation in practice and the conditions of stability. When this model is implemented in practice, the State pursues the objective of central ethnic-national development in the country, as well as its isolation from other ethnic groups. Under the concept of "ethnic democracy" the ethnic minority is granted limited rights, the state constantly monitors its scope, considering the interests of the "main" nation. It is concluded that the implementation of the "ethnic democracy" model deliberately violates the right to self-identification of a part of the population (ethnic minority), therefore "ethnic democracy" is an element of state policy that addresses inequality or a desire for total assimilation.

The paper considers the problems that arose during the implementation of the multiculturalism policy in countries situated in Europe, North America, Australia, and New Zealand with a multinational population. Multiculturalism is becoming the basis of state policy, as it integrates and adapts the minority and majority into a single community while emphasizing and preserving ethnic, linguistic, and confessional identity. The authors identify four key socio-political cases of multiculturalism: Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the Scandinavian Peninsula, which reflect the modern results of the multiculturalism policy. The paper notes that the policy of multiculturalism of these countries consolidates concerning the "indigenous peoples" the official status of the ethnic minority and the language of indigenous peoples within the framework of the main state legislative acts. It is concluded that their models of multicultural development are the most appropriate for multinational Russian states. ; El artículo considera los problemas que surgieron durante la implementación de la política de multiculturalismo en países de Europa, América del Norte, Australia y Nueva Zelanda con una población multinacional. El multiculturalismo se está convirtiendo en la base de la política estatal, ya que integra y adapta a la minoría y la mayoría en una sola comunidad mientras enfatiza y preserva la identidad étnica, lingüística y confesional. Los autores identifican cuatro casos sociopolíticos clave de multiculturalismo: Canadá, Australia, Nueva Zelanda y la Península Escandinava, que reflejan los resultados modernos de la política del multiculturalismo. El documento observa que la política de multiculturalismo de estos países consolida en relación con los "pueblos indígenas" el estatus oficial de la minoría étnica y la lengua de los pueblos indígenas en el marco de los principales actos legislativos estatales. Se concluye que sus modelos de desarrollo multicultural son los más adecuados para los estados multinacionales rusos. ; O ...